‘Desperate Housewives’ star Felicity Huffman was sentenced yesterday to 14 days in prison for paying $15,000 (€13,500) to rig her daughter’s SAT scores in the college admissions scandal that ensnared dozens of wealthy and well-connected parents.
Huffman (56) became the first of 34 parents to be sentenced in the case. She was also given a $30,000 fine, 250 hours of community service and a year of supervised release.
Before sentencing, she tearfully described her daughter asking why Huffman didn’t trust her.
“I can only say I am so sorry, Sophia,” Huffman said.
“I was frightened. I was stupid, and I was so wrong. I am deeply ashamed of what I have done. I have inflicted more damage than I could ever imagine.
“I now see all the things that led me down this road, but ultimately none of the reasons matter because at the end of the day I had a choice. I could have said no.”
A total of 51 people have been charged in the scheme, the biggest college admissions case ever prosecuted by the Justice Department.
Prosecutors had recommended a month in prison for Huffman, while her lawyers said she should get probation.
In arguing for incarceration, Assistant US Attorney Eric Rosen said prosecutors had no reason to doubt the rationale Huffman offered, her fears and insecurities as a parent, for taking part in the scheme.
“But with all due respect to the defendant, welcome to parenthood,” Mr Rosen said.
“Parenthood is terrifying, exhausting and stressful, but that’s what every parent goes through.
“What parenthood does not do, it does not make you a felon, it does not make you cheat. In fact, it makes you want to serve as a positive role model for your children.”
Huffman’s lawyer Martin Murphy argued that her crimes were less serious than those of her co-defendants, noting that she paid a low amount and that, unlike others, she did not enlist her daughter in the scheme.
“One of the key things the court should do is to impose a sentence that treats Ms Huffman like other similarly situated defendants, not treat her more harshly because of her wealth and fame, or treat her more favourably because of her wealth and fame,” Mr Murphy said.
The scandal has embroiled elite universities across the country, including Yale, Stanford, Georgetown and UCLA. It exposed the lengths to which parents will go to get their children into the “right” schools and reinforced suspicions the college admissions process is slanted toward the rich. Prosecutors said parents schemed to manipulate test scores and bribed coaches to get their children into elite schools by having them labelled as recruited athletes for sports they didn’t even play.
Huffman pleaded guilty in May to a single count of conspiracy and fraud as part of a deal with prosecutors.
The case is seen as an indicator of what’s in store for other defendants. Over the next two months, nearly a dozen parents are scheduled to be sentenced. Fifteen parents have pleaded guilty, while 19 are fighting the charges.
Among those contesting the charges are ‘Full House’ actress Lori Loughlin and her fashion designer husband, Mossimo Giannulli, who are accused of paying to get their two daughters into the University of Southern California as fake athletes.
Former Stanford University sailing coach John Vandemoer is the only other person sentenced so far and received a day in prison. He admitted helping students to get into Stanford as recruited athletes in exchange for $270,000 for his sailing programme.
Huffman paid $15,000 to boost her older daughter’s SAT scores with the help of William ‘Rick’ Singer, an admission consultant at the centre of the scheme. Singer, who has pleaded guilty, allegedly bribed an examiner to correct the teenager’s answers.
Source: Read Full Article