President Trump’s 50-minute-long meeting on Sunday with Kim Jong-un, leader of North Korea, in the Korean Peninsula’s Demilitarized Zone was, in typical Trumpian fashion, good television. But it has the potential to be something much more significant.
While meeting in the thin buffer zone established after the end of the Korean War, the two leaders agreed to resume talks about Pyongyang’s nuclear program. That may not sound like much. But following March’s failed summit in Hanoi, it could provide the basis for detailed talks between real negotiators, signifying an important step toward reaching an agreement to address the global threat of North Korea’s nuclear program.
Skepticism is, of course, warranted. Both sides have zigged and zagged on policy since Mr. Trump took office. But there are signs that Mr. Trump and Mr. Kim want a deal. Mr. Trump has been pushing for one ever since he came into office — often against the opposition of his advisers. Mr. Kim, for his part, appears more interested in developing his country’s economy than in developing more weapons of mass destruction.
Contrary to popular wisdom, reaching a deal that ends North Korea’s nuclear program is not impossible. In fact, the outlines for such a deal are fairly well known. I’ve heard them myself. In 2013, when I was a private citizen working at a think tank, North Korean officials told me and other former American government officials that a denuclearization deal would take place in three phases. North Korea would freeze production of nuclear weapons, roll back the bomb stockpile and nuclear program, and finally eliminate it. Along the way, the United States would eliminate sanctions, open diplomatic liaison relations and conclude a peace agreement to end the Korean War. The agreement reached over the weekend is an essential step in that direction.
But it’s only a first step. That’s because Mr. Trump and Mr. Kim can’t get there alone. While the two leaders seem to enjoy spectacles like their historic summit in Singapore a year ago and this weekend’s meeting in the DMZ, real progress toward a deal will require them to empower representatives to work out the details — not during one meeting but in days, weeks or perhaps months of direct talks — and then present them to the two leaders for approval. That’s nothing new in dealing with the North Koreans, but it has been missing amid Mr. Trump’s focus on summitry.
The Hanoi summit ended with Mr. Trump walking away from the negotiating table, but it may nonetheless have provided future negotiators with some foundations. It pinpointed key differences on denuclearization and sanctions relief, providing a clear focus for renewed talks. When talks resume, bridging this gap will be the negotiators No. 1 priority.
Of course, there are serious pitfalls ahead.
A dysfunctional decision-making process in the White House and Mr. Trump’s limited attention span have allowed opponents of diplomacy — like John Bolton, the national security adviser — to upend the president’s policy. A prime suspect in sabotaging the Hanoi summit by convincing the president to table proposals that were blatantly nonnegotiable, Mr. Bolton was conspicuously absent on Sunday. He had been sent on an official visit to Mongolia instead, maybe a sign that Mr. Trump is wise to his antics.
The North Koreans also need to get their act together. Until now, they have hesitated to talk to the United States outside of high-level summits, perhaps because they thought Mr. Kim could best Mr. Trump in a one-on-one negotiating match. But they may be having second thoughts given the failure in Hanoi, which provoked pushback from North Korean skeptics of Mr. Kim’s initiative. Sunday’s agreement may signal that Mr. Kim has dealt with those skeptics, at least for the moment, and is now ready to move forward with negotiations.
Reaching a deal will require difficult compromises by both sides. The Trump administration will have to accept a deal that falls short of North Korea giving up all of its weapons right away but that lays out a path to final denuclearization in phases. The North Koreans will have to accept that they cannot get the comprehensive relief from international sanctions that they want right away. Finding compromises, however, will only be possible through face-to-face talks between negotiators, not through tweets, press statements or speeches.
Even with hard negotiations, the ultimate success of a deal may come back to Mr. Trump and Mr. Kim. Both leaders have a lot at stake. For Mr. Trump, a deal with North Korea would be a foreign policy victory that he could use to stick it to his Democratic presidential rivals, almost all of whom have pooh-poohed his initiative. For Mr. Kim, a deal would propel his country forward on a path to economic modernization while cementing his continued leadership. And what better way to end this season of the Trump-Kim saga than a summit and a deal? It would make for great television.
Joel S. Wit (@joel_wit38) is a senior fellow at the Henry L. Stimson Center in Washington and the founder of the North Korea website 38North. He worked for 15 years in the State Department on arms control and nonproliferation issues.
The Times is committed to publishing a diversity of letters to the editor. We’d like to hear what you think about this or any of our articles. Here are some tips. And here’s our email: [email protected].
Follow The New York Times Opinion section on Facebook, Twitter (@NYTopinion) and Instagram.
Source: Read Full Article