Meghan Markle losing credibility 'day after day' says Foufas
We use your sign-up to provide content in ways you’ve consented to and to improve our understanding of you. This may include adverts from us and 3rd parties based on our understanding. You can unsubscribe at any time. More info
Meghan Markle and Prince Harry continue to use their newfound independence outside of the Royal Family to discuss issues they are passionate about. Last month, the Sussexes urged world leaders to take action in ending the pandemic during the “window of opportunity” ahead of the beginning of the Cop26 summit. In an open letter published on 29 October, written alongside World Health Organisation (WHO) Director-General, Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, the couple said: “We understand that the pandemic recovery is nuanced and deeply complex, but we have a window of opportunity to come together as a global community and meet our humanitarian promises. “By delivering already-pledged doses, helping countries manufacture their own vaccines, and prioritising vaccines for nations in need, the G20 can help ensure the world delivers on these promises.”
This week, Meghan has also raised awareness for another issue – speaking candidly about her fight for paid family leave in the US.
Meghan was asked this week by Andrew Ross Sorkin, editor at large and founder of DealBook The New York Times, whether she had “anxiety about being involved in politics”.
During the conversation titled: ‘Minding The Gap’, Meghan responded: “I don’t see this as a political issue, frankly, there’s certainly a precedent amongst my husband’s family and the Royal Family of not having any involvement in politics, but I think this is patently, from my standpoint, just a humanitarian issue.”
The Duchess’ choice of words were incredibly similar to those used by Princess Diana who addressed similar accusations of political interference.
She addressed the controversy surrounding her Angola visit, where her strong words on a landmine ban had reportedly left the UK Government taken aback, as British leaders were not yet ready to sign a landmine treaty.
During an unearthed speech from 1997 at the Royal Geographical Society in London, Diana said: “Anywhere I see suffering, that is where I want to be, doing what I can.
“I am not a political figure, I am a humanitarian figure, always was, always will be.
“Nothing brings me more happiness than trying to help the most vulnerable people in society. It is a goal and an essential part of my life—a kind of destiny. Whoever is in distress can call on me. I will come running wherever they are.
“I’m not a political animal but I think the biggest disease this world suffers from in this day and age is the disease of people feeling unloved, and I know that I can give love for a minute, for half an hour, for a day, for a month, but I can give—I’m very happy to do that, and I want to do that.”
In October 2020, Harry and Meghan sparked controversy ahead of the US election.
In a video message, the Duke and Duchess of Sussex both called on American voters to “reject hate speech, misinformation and online negativity” in “the most important election of our life”.
While not naming the US President, some have claimed this is alluding to Donald Trump.
The intervention sparked heated debate, with some claiming it broke royal protocol dictating that members of the Windsor family should not comment on politics.
Like Diana, Harry and Meghan have devoted much of their time to championing charities and other worthy causes.
The Princess of Wales was the patron and president to multiple charities throughout her life, in which many of the organisations focused on AIDS awareness and prevention, banning the use of landmines, battling poverty and homelessness, various cancer trusts, Leprosy, as well as opening up the stigma surrounding mental illness.
A royal expert suggested in September that Meghan could be destined for a career in politics after the Sussexes featured on the cover of TIME magazine.
The profile of the couple said they “run toward the struggle” and “turn compassion into boots on the ground”.
The cover was similar to a 2016 edition, which featured former US President Barack Obama.
Royal commentator Richard Fitzwilliams told The Sun last month: “This magazine cover has made it very very clear what’s in the couple’s mind ‒ and especially Meghan’s mind ‒ and that’s politics. It must be!
Prince Harry and Meghan Markle warned ‘you can’t keep trashing people’ [INSIGHT]
Prince William and Harry’s feud ‘spilled over to Meghan and Kate’ [ANALYSIS]
Prince Charles angered Meghan Markle with Royal Family plan [INSIGHT]
“I think there is absolutely no doubt that if they made the cover it’s not about what they’ve achieved, but what they could achieve.
“They’re going to become more and more visible. I think that they’re looking at politics.”
The royal expert described their Time cover as “a considerable feat” and said it proves “the power of their brand”.
He continued: “If you’re looking at the future and you’re looking at Meghan as an activist, for gender equality, the environment, diversity, I think that it makes total sense that becoming a political figure would certainly be on the cards.
“You’re looking at Congress ‒ or maybe even the Senate, she’s only 40 so there’s plenty of time.
“Above all what this says is attention ‒ this cover proves that they have this global pull.
“I think Meghan and politics are going to be synonymous at a certain point.”
Source: Read Full Article