We will use your email address only for sending you newsletters. Please see our Privacy Notice for details of your data protection rights.
Meghan Markle, 38, moved back to her hometown Los Angeles with her husband Prince Harry and their son Archie Harrison in March. Since stepping away from their royal roles the couple have been able to express themselves more freely and align themselves with political matters.
While senior royals are expected to remain politically neutral, these restrictions no longer apply to Meghan who has confirmed she plans to vote in the US presidential election this November.
Meghan is among 100 influential women to share why they are voting in new Marie Claire article 100 Influential Women on Why They’re Voting in the 2020 Election.
In the piece, Meghan issues a heartfelt plea about the importance of exercising one’s right to vote and reveals a key influence on both her and Prince Harry.
Meghan said: “I know what it’s like to have a voice, and also what it’s like to feel voiceless.”
“I also know that so many men and women have put their lives on the line for us to be heard. And that opportunity, that fundamental right, is in our ability to exercise our right to vote and to make all of our voices heard.”
Touching on one of her and Prince Harry’s favourite quotes, Meghan added: “One of my favourite quotes, and one that my husband and I have referred to often, is from Kate Sheppard, a leader in the suffragist movement in New Zealand, who said, ‘Do not think your single vote does not matter much.
“The rain that refreshes the parched ground is made up of single drops.’ That is why I vote.”
Prince Harry and Meghan moved away from the royal bubble in hope of making a “more peaceful life” for themselves.
However, the publication of a new, unofficial, biography detailing the couple’s exit from the Royal Family has brought the pair back into the spotlight.
Finding Freedom by authors Omid Scobie and Carolyn Durand brings to light sensational claims about the events which led to Meghan and Harry relinquishing their roles as senior royals.
From the alleged tensions between royal brothers Prince Harry and William to reports Harry and Meghan felt ignored by Palace aides, the book is said to have been written with input from those “closest to the couple.”
While a spokesman for the Sussexes has issued a statement denying Harry and Meghan were directly involved with the project, the detail with which it is written has fuelled speculation.
Rule stops Queen’s ‘favourite’ grandchild Lady Louise being Duchess [INSIGHT]
Princess Beatrice ‘clung’ to Eugenie ahead of wedding – expert [PICTURES]
Sarah Ferguson never used full royal title as Prince Andrew’s wife [VIDEO]
Meghan and Harry are currently in a one-year trial period away from the Royal Family in which they will work to become financially independent from the crown.
They have agreed with the Queen they will no longer use the word royal going forward and while they will keep their HRH styles, they will not use these formally either.
In recent weeks, Prince Harry has shared his views on a plethora of difficult topics including how to tackle racism.
Last week the Duke penned a lengthy essay urging for social media companies to reform.
One royal commentator has commented on how Meghan and Harry may now find their feet as activists outside of the Fold.
In response to the book Finding Freedom that was published by Harper Collins on August 11, royal expert Richard Fitzwilliams said: “The authors take on Harry and Meghan is mostly hagiographic.
“But as the details it contains lack sources, though we are assured what it claims are facts have two each, it will be of little historical interest other than as a curiosity.
He added: “A serious historian will shed far more light on what really happened.
“The parting of the ways was tragic, particularly as they are such committed activists and had an enormous global reach which could have been so beneficial to the monarchy at home and abroad.
“On the other hand, you can see why their PR was eventually based at Buckingham Palace and was not theirs alone, which they would have liked.
“Then they became independent, with an agreement brokered by the Queen.
“This will be reassessed early next year.
“They felt they had no other option to strike out on their own even though Harry lost his military appointments. To quote Cromwell “cruel necessity”!”
Source: Read Full Article