Nicola Sturgeon risks further humiliation as independence bid could be ruled ‘illegal’

SNP ‘don’t have answers that are palatable’ says expert

When you subscribe we will use the information you provide to send you these newsletters. Sometimes they’ll include recommendations for other related newsletters or services we offer. Our Privacy Notice explains more about how we use your data, and your rights. You can unsubscribe at any time.

The SNP failed to secure an absolute majority in the Scottish parliament but is vowing to push ahead with her independence plans. However Douglas Ross, Scottish Conservative leader, has ruled another referendum could be judged illegal by the Scottish government’s chief legal officer.

Mr Ross argues the Scotland Act 1998 makes it clear holding a referendum is a “reserved” matter requiring Westminster approval.

This was granted in 2014 with the SNP going on to lose the referendum by 55 percent to 45 percent.

However unionists are arguing now isn’t the time for another public vote.

Speaking at a press conference Mr Ross said he expects Lord James Wolffe, the Lord Advocate, to intervene if another referendum bill is tabled.

He said: “It is not within the competency of the Scottish Parliament to hold another independence referendum.

“In 2014 we had the gold standard, which was one which secured a section 30 Order.

“I would expect the holder of the Office of Lord Advocate to uphold the competency of what the Scottish government can and cannot do.”

Ms Sturgeon has insisted there will be another independence referendum during this Scottish parliament term.

She is likely to need support from the Greens to get any referendum bill through parliament.

However Mr Ross argued this could prompt action from the Lord Advocate.

He continued: “His role, or whoever is in that position if there is any change, is absolutely crucial.

“They have a Scotland Act to base their decisions on in terms of competency of what the Scottish government can and cannot do.


SNP to enlist EU allies to ‘humiliate’ Boris Johnson into referendum [SHOCK]
BBC’s Andrew Marr wrecks Nicola Sturgeon’s independence plans [REVEAL]
Gove savages Sturgeon’s Indy demands ‘Most voted for parties OPPOSE’ [SCOTLAND]

“Nicola Sturgeon is framing this as a battle in which she believes she can force the UK government to take the Scottish government to court, but let’s look at the Scotland Act and what the Scottish Parliament and Government have within their own competencies.

“Nicola Sturgeon is jumping many steps ahead to distract from issues within her own party and the disappointment of many SNP members that she has again failed to secure the majority.”

Whilst nationalists got more seats unionists are pointing out pro-UK parties got more constituency votes in total.

Ms Sturgeon has warned the dispute could end up in court if the British Government is disruptive.

SNP have 'taken their eye off the ball' says Oliver Mundell

Speaking to Sky News she said: “If we end up in court it would be because we have a UK government that refuses to accept Scottish democracy.”

However Michael Gove, the Cabinet Office minister, insisted the UK Government won’t need to take Ms Sturgeon to the Supreme Court.

He commented: “We’re not going to go there.

“What I’m going to do is to make sure we do everything we can to concentrate our focus on recovery.”

Senior SNP figures have suggested another referendum could be held even without British Government consent.

However if this happens Mr Ross argues unionists should boycott the poll.
Source: Read Full Article