Meghan Markle: Expert discusses ‘political ambitions’
When you subscribe we will use the information you provide to send you these newsletters.Sometimes they’ll include recommendations for other related newsletters or services we offer.Our Privacy Notice explains more about how we use your data, and your rights.You can unsubscribe at any time.
During the bombshell interview with Oprah Winfrey, Meghan claimed she and Harry had been married three days before the royal wedding by the Archbishop of Canterbury. Despite her claim, Piers insisted the story seemed implausible and questioned whether the major event watched by millions had been a “sham”. Not only did Piers sensationally question whether the royal wedding was a sham but also that the secret “ceremony” was “illegal”.
Writing to the Mail Online, Piers said: “For example, Meghan said she and Harry got secretly married three days before their wedding, in a tiny service officiated by the Archbishop of Canterbury.
“Really? So, the marriage we all watched was a sham?
“And Britain’s most senior clergyman was in on it, performing an illegal ceremony in a garden?”
A marriage can only be legal under the rule of the Church of England if there are two witnesses present.
The public must also be given access to the church so that objections can be made and according to officials, a couple cannot be married twice.
In the interview, however, Meghan said: “You know, three days before our wedding, we got married.
“No one knows that.
“The vows that we have framed in our room are just the two of us in our backyard with the Archbishop of Canterbury.”
JUST IN: Brexit live: Britain to tell EU AstraZeneca jab would not exist
Within the interview, Harry also claimed the Archbishop of Canterbury Justin Welby had been present with the pair.
The Archbishop later released a statement saying he would not be commenting on Meghan and Harry’s claim.
Commenting on the matter, former chief clerk at the Faculty Office, Stephen Borton claimed the Duchess had been confused over the matter.
He told The Sun: “I’m sorry, but Meghan is obviously confused and clearly misinformed.
Royal Family LIVE: Piers Morgan attacks Meghan over passport claim [Live blog]
Royal reporter who broke Kate vs Meghan row reveals online ‘vitriol’ [Latest]
‘Stoic’ Queen ‘giving little away of any inner turmoil’ [Update]
“They did not marry three days earlier in front of the Archbishop of Canterbury.
“The Special Licence I helped draw up enabled them to marry at St George’s Chapel in Windsor and what happened there on 19 May 2018 and was seen by millions around the world was the official wedding as recognised by the Church of England and the law.
“What I suspect they did was exchange some simple vows they had perhaps written themselves, and which is fashionable, and said that in front of the Archbishop — or, and more likely, it was a simple rehearsal.”
Following the interview with Oprah, the palace released a statement where it claimed the Duke and Duchess remained loved members of the Royal Family.
It also insisted the Royal Family would address the claims privately amid claims of racist comments made concerning Archie’s skin colour.
A statement read: “The whole family is saddened to learn the full extent of how challenging the last few years have been for Harry and Meghan.
“The issues raised, particularly that of race, are concerning.
“Whilst some recollections may vary, they are taken very seriously and will be addressed by the family privately.
“Harry, Meghan and Archie will always be much-loved family members.”
Express.co.uk has contacted Meghan and Harry’s representatives for comment.
Source: Read Full Article