Stephen Pound: It's wrong that court trials are under Queen's name
We use your sign-up to provide content in ways you’ve consented to and to improve our understanding of you. This may include adverts from us and 3rd parties based on our understanding. You can unsubscribe at any time. More info
Prince Charles has been urged to step down from his spot on the line of succession and let his eldest son, Prince William, succeed the Queen. Former Labour MP Stephen Pound claimed the Prince of Wales had not “kept his side of the deal” as he repeatedly spoke out about political issues royals traditionally try not to weigh in on. Speaking to talkRADIO, Mr Pound said: “The deal we have with Prince Charles was, we pay for someone to squeeze the toothpaste onto his toothbrush, and he keeps out of politics.”
“We’ve kept our side of the deal, he hasn’t kept his side of the deal, and honestly, I’ve met him a couple of times, he’s a perfectly charming bloke, but he’s trying to be a constitutional and a ceremonial monarch.”
He added that: “I honestly believe that someone like Kate could save the Royal Family.”
“Ultimately, I just want to see the confidence of this guy, I want to see the confidence to say we don’t have to be ruled over, we don’t have to be subjects, we can actually be citizens, in the same way that the Dutch are.
“What is wrong with that ceremonial monarch? we can keep the glitz and we can keep the glory and we can keep the tourists pouring through at the Tower of London, and Buckingham Palace, you name it.”
JUST IN: Our leaders are deluded – we are broke and up to our necks in trouble SIR BERNARD INGHAM
Mr Pound went on to talk about constitutional matters, claiming: “Please, don’t have a system where every single Member of Parliament has to swear an oath of fealty to an inherited monarch, that everything in British law is done in her name.”
“Everybody that comes to trial in this country is trialled in the Queen’s name. I’m sorry, that just isn’t right.”
Although Britain has a constitutional monarchy, in modern practice the Queen holds no real political power to act independently of the wishes of Parliament or the Prime Minister.
The Queen’s role in Parliament is more ceremonial, she officially opens each new session of Parliament with the “Queen’s Speech.”
Prince Andrew: Lorraine says it’s ‘weird’ seeing royal in documentary
She is also relied upon to give “Royal Assent” to all bills passed by Parliament before becoming laws, but the approval is simply a formality.
Many have speculated that the Queen’s successful reign has been thanks to her lack of involvement in politics and her discreet character.
The Queen Mother coined the phrase, “Never complain, never explain,” but as the monarchy modernizes, it seems that other members of the family have taken a different approach to their PR.
According to historian Prof Jenny Hocking noted the Prince of Wales “makes no bones” about being more outspoken about his position than Her Majesty.
Prince Andrew concedes ‘inevitable’ as legal team accept papers served – 21-day countdown
Royal fans delighted as Beatrice baby name favourite pays tribute to Queen
‘What a joke!’ Prince Harry contradiction mocked by Ann Widdecombe during brutal rant
Speaking with Express.co.uk in April, Prof Hocking said: “Many people have been disturbed by the way in which Charles, far more overtly than the Queen, has engaged in political matters.
“I mean, he makes no bones about that in many respects.
“He becomes involved in political questions over architecture, over the environment, over advocating for the fox hunt and so on.
“Well, traditionally, these are areas in which the monarchy claims to have no involvement, should have no involvement.
“So he’s already, I think, caused some consternation with his public political pronouncements that are not the place of the future monarch to make.”
Source: Read Full Article